### This version of Bronshtein's physics cube shows how the main theories of physics are connected and which limits define them.

● Consequences and predictions

● Summary: What the Bronshtein cube shows and what it doesn't

● Websites and bibliography

● Appendix: Another version of the Bronshtein cube

### The Bronshtein *limit* cube of physics

The main theories of physics can be distinguished by the combination
of the speed of light c, the quantum of action ℏ and
the gravitational constant G that they contain as a *limit*.
Each limit value *defines* the respective theory.
(Note that the limits are not unique; for example, both c and c^{2}
are defining limits of special relativity.)

Physics starts at the bottom, where *no* limits are assumed, and
proceeds towards the top, increasing precision at every corner.
The topmost corner, the theory of relativistic quantum gravity, limits *all*
observables. It provides the *complete* description of motion;
and the description provides *complete* precision.

Several of the limits found in the cube are not well known.
About the maximum force c^{4}/4G, see the
page and papers dedicated to the topic.
About the "limit" 4G that distinguishes unbound and bound motion,
see the preprint C. Schiller, The quadruple gravitational constant, the Bronshtein cube of
limits, and implications.

The physics cube is often called the *Bronshtein cube*
(that is how he wrote his name himself) or also the *Bronstein cube*.
Bronshtein was a brilliant physicist, born 1906 in Vinnitsya in Ukraine.
He developed the concept of the physics cube as a young man and published
it in 1933 and 1934. He was killed by Stalin's henchmen at the age of 31.
He was rehabilitated in the 1950s.

In short, the Bronshtein cube *with limits* illustrates how the
fields of physics are defined. It also shows that physics laws are *simple*.

*

### Consequences and predictions

Describing nature with limits implies that there are *no infinite
quantities* in nature, neither infinitely large nor infinitely small.

The speed limit, its simplicity and its confirmation by experiment
imply the prediction that there is *no physics beyond special relativity.*

The action limit, its simplicity and its confirmation by experiment
imply the prediction that there is *no physics beyond quantum theory.*

The force limit, its simplicity and its confirmation by experiment
imply the prediction that there is *no physics beyond
general relativity* – thus no higher-order terms in the Lagrangian.
Maximum force also suggests that the hoop conjecture is valid; both
concepts are closely tied to horizons.

Combining the limits implies that the double Planck length is the shortest measurable length in nature. And this even though space is conetinuous at the same time.

Together, all the limits also imply, as explained on a separate page, that
*all of physics can be summarized in 9 lines.*

Again, the limits are not unique; other choices are also possible,
using other powers of c, 4G and ℏ. For example, there is a maximum power
c^{5}/4G or a maximum mass flow rate c^{3}/4G in general
relativity, and a minimum length, a minimum area, a minimum volume,
a maximum acceleration, or a maximum mass density in relativistic quantum
gravity, the uppermost theory in the Bronshtein cube.

The Bronshtein cube is three-dimensional. Explaining the origin of the number of dimensions of the physics cube is not straightforward.

Together, the limits imply that the Planck scale is the central scale in
nature, because they predict the *lack of any trans-Planckian effects.*
In particular, the limits imply:

- There are no points in space or time.
- There is a smallest length.
- Nevertheless, space-time is effectively continuous at larger scales.
- There are no higher dimensions.
- There are no lower dimensions.
- There is no space-time foam.
- There is no discrete space-time.
- There is no non-commutative space-time.
- There is no space-time lattice.
- There is no time-independent discrete space-time structure.
- There is no doubly special relativity.
- There are no point particles.
- There are no singularities.
- There is no conformal gravity.
- There is no conformal field theory.
- There is no supersymmetry.
- There is no supergravity.
- There are no twistors.
- There is no holographic principle.
- All equations of physics follow from inequalities involving limits.

In short, the Bronshtein limit cube simplies physics as much as possible. In addition, the Bronshtein limit cube imposes strict requirements on the unified description of motion. In fact, almost no conjecture on the unified description of motion found in the research literature satisfies these requirements.

(The consequences and a way out of these restrictions are told in the *research* paper
"From maximum force to physics in 9 lines and towards relativistic quantum gravity" at
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365750175.)

*

### Summary: What the Bronshtein limit cube shows and what it doesn't

1. The Bronshtein limit cube shows that physics is simple. Each theory is defined by a simple limit.

2. The Bronshtein limit cube shows that the unified description of motion is
*near.* The defining limits of the unified description are known:
they contain c, ℏ and 4G. In other words, fundamental physics
is known in all its experimental and theoretical
consequences – namely relativity, gravity and quantum physics.
In other terms, fundamental physics is close to its completion.

3. The Bronshtein limit cube does *not* explain the origin of the
elementary particles and their properties, *nor* does it explain the origin
of the interactions and their properties.
In particular, the origin of the values for
elementary particle masses, for their mixing angles, and for the coupling
constants is *not* explained.

*

### Websites and bibliography

In 2022, a new website dedicated to the topic has appeared: https://cube-of-physics.org/.

A longer writeup of this page is C. Schiller, The quadruple gravitational constant, the Bronshtein cube of limits, and implications. Download the preprint here.

The history of the cube is cloudy. It also depends on the point of view taken, in particular on whether is it seen as a cube of theories, as a cube of fundamental constants, or, as is done here, as a cube of limits.

This reference is the origin of the cube, but is hard to find: M. Bronshtein, K voprosu o vozmozhnoy teorii mira kak tselogo [On a possible theory of the world as a whole], in Osnovnye problemy kosmicheskoy fiziki [Basic problems of cosmic physics], Kiev, ONTI (1934) 186-218 (in Russian).

This often-cited reference is about c, G and h, but does not define the cube: G. Gamov, D. Ivanenko and L. Landau, Zh. Russ. Fiz. Khim. Obstva. Chast Fiz. 60 (1928) 13, (in Russian). Reprinted in G. Gamow, D. Ivanenko & L. Landau, World constants and limiting transition, Physics of Atomic Nuclei volume 65 (2002) 1373–1375. https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1495650

This often-cited reference has nothing on the cube itself: M. Bronshtein, Physikalische Zeitschrift der Sowjetunion, 9, 140 (1936). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-011-1285-4

The papers by Okun and by Oriti on the same topic are cited in the preprint.

*

### Appendix: Another version of the Bronshtein cube

The physics cube also structures the adventure presented in the
volumes of the free Motion Mountain Physics Textbook.
This version has more details and mentions
the adventures encountered in the different theories:

* * *